That means that the bottom 90% would have seen their earnings grow 17.9 percentage points more over the 1979–2017 period if they had enjoyed average growth (i.e., no increase in equality, 40.1 less 22.2). “Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance in the U.S.: Perceptions, Facts, and Challenges.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. One prominent example of the “market for talent” argument—based on the premise that “it is other professionals, too,” not just CEOs, who are seeing a generous rise in pay—comes from Kaplan (2012a, 2012b). Similarly, our reported growth of the options-granted measure of 1.7% exceeded that in the corrected data, where this measure of compensation fell 4.9%. 1. Stock awards now make up about half of all CEO compensation. 3. CEO compensation, however, grew three times faster! (The comparisons end in 2017 because 2018 data for top 0.1% wages are not yet available). Board of Directors Projected value for 2018 is based on the percent change in CEO pay in the samples available in June 2017 and in June 2018 (labeled first-half [FH] data) applied to the full-year 2017 value. This SEC capitulation diminished the utility of these new median worker compensation measures for making comparisons across firms and will affect the utility of comparing them over time when additional years of data are available. The authors thank the Stephen Silberstein Foundation for its generous support of this research. The idea is that CEO performance … Some observers argue that exorbitant CEO compensation is merely a symbolic issue, with no consequences for the vast majority of workers. This report is part of an ongoing series of annual reports monitoring trends in CEO compensation. Here we draw on and update the Bivens and Mishel (2013) analysis to show that CEO compensation grew far faster than compensation of very highly paid workers over the last few decades, which suggests that the market for skills was not responsible for the rapid growth of CEO compensation. There is large variation in pay ratios across industries, within an industry, and across revenue sizes. For comparison, Table 2 also presents the average annual compensation (wages and benefits of a full-time, full-year worker) of a private-sector production/nonsupervisory worker (a group covering more than 80% of payroll employment), allowing us to compare CEO compensation with that of a typical worker. CEO compensation (realized stock options) grew strongly throughout the 1980s but exploded in the 1990s. Kaplan, Steven N. 2012b. Both graphs show the total contribution of stock awards and options in total CEO compensation. His articles have appeared in a variety of academic and nonacademic journals. Importantly, rising CEO pay does not reflect rising value of skills, but rather CEOs’ use of their power to set their own pay. The slight loosening of the relationship between overall stock market growth and CEO compensation growth does not alter this conclusion. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more about our global network of member firms. CEO compensation grew far faster than that of the top 0.1% of earners over the recovery since 2009, as the ratio spiked from 4.61 to 5.40. Bivens, Josh, and Lawrence Mishel. The national average salary for a CEO is $151,987 in United States. Notes: CEO average annual compensation is measured for CEOs at the top 350 U.S. firms ranked by sales. The managerial power view asserts that CEOs have excessive, noncompetitive influence over the compensation packages they receive. Using the measure that includes stock options realized, we find that CEO pay fell by 0.5% from 2017 to 2018, to $17.2 million on average in 2018. Note that Table 1 provides a projection for data for 2018. A podcast by our professionals who share a sneak peek at life inside Deloitte. Each year’s sample includes the largest 350 firms for which ExecuComp provides data. May 2018. Steven Balsam, an accounting professor at Temple University and author of Equity Compensation: Motivations and Implications (2013), has provided useful advice on data construction and interpretation over the years. The ratios reported to the SEC will reflect compensation of workers in the specific firm. As the share of CEO compensation represented by stock options declines, and the share represented by stock awards grows, CEO compensation levels and growth will possibly be increasingly understated in our measures as well as in other measures, including those used by companies to construct the CEO-to-worker ratios reported to the SEC. National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) Tables [online data tables]. The fact that they have nothing to lose—but potentially a lot to gain—might lead options-holding CEOs to take excessive risks to bump up the stock price. These shares may actually understate the role of nonfinance executives and the financial sector, because they do not account for increased spousal income from these sources in those cases where the head of household is not an executive or in finance.15. First, our methodology compares CEO compensation to the compensation of the typical worker in the main industry of the CEO’s company rather than just within one specific firm. In contrast, the typical workers in these large firms saw their annual compensation grow by just 5.3% over the recovery and actually fall by 0.2% between 2017 and 2018. See Sabadish and Mishel 2013 for more information about our data sources and methodology. Clifford (2017) recommends setting a cap on compensation and taxing companies on any amount over the cap, similar to the way baseball team payrolls are taxed when salaries exceed a cap. In general, the updated information and our observations are similar to the original report, as the latest batch of company filings were similar to the earlier disclosures. CEO compensation at middle-market U.S. companies rose by 3.2 percent last year to an average of $3.8 million, and CFO compensation rose by 4.1 percent to an average of nearly $1.5 million. Average pay of CEOs at the top 350 firms in 2018 was $17.2 million—or $14.0 million using a more conservative measure. They also earn far more than the typical worker, and their pay has grown much more rapidly. CEO pay growth has had spillover effects, pulling up the pay of other executives and managers, who constitute more than 40% of all top 1.0% and 0.1% earners.3 Consequently, the growth of CEO and executive compensation overall was a major factor driving the doubling of the income shares of the top 1% and top 0.1% of U.S. households from 1979 to 2007 (Bakija, Cole, and Heim 2012; Bivens and Mishel 2013). Report • By Lawrence Mishel and Julia Wolfe • August 14, 2019. Clifford, Steven. A one-point rise in the ratio is the equivalent of the average CEO earning an additional amount equal to that of the average earnings of someone in the top 0.1%. These six companies are good examples of companies that are potentially concerned about an increase in their respective pay ratios next year, when bonus and equity awards are once again made to the CEO. 298, June 2013. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. In 2017 this ratio was 5.40, 2.27 points higher than the historical average of 3.18 (a relative gain in wages earned by the equivalent of 2.22 very-high-wage earners). However, CEO compensation measured with options granted in 2007 remained down, at $14.0 million, substantially below the 2000 level. Like athletes and actors, CEOs provide a level of talent that is required to produce the desired product in this case, a strongly performing company. “Greg Mankiw Forgets to Offer Data for His Biggest Claim.” Working Economics (Economic Policy Institute blog), June 25, 2013. Other groups with similar backgrounds—private company executives, corporate lawyers, hedge fund investors, private equity investors and others—have seen significant pay increases where there is a competitive market for talent and managerial power problems are absent. He is the co-author of all 12 editions of The State of Working America. FBE 01.11. 1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/4173. Nor are they captured in the SEC measure. Other policies that could potentially limit executive pay growth are changes in corporate governance, such as greater use of “say on pay,” which allows a firm’s shareholders to vote on top executives’ compensation. After 2009, CEO compensation measured using options realized resumed an upward trajectory. It allows us to avoid artificially lowering the estimated change in this year’s CEO compensation relative to last year’s and earlier years’.5, Using this method, we find that average CEO compensation (based on stock options realized) was $17.18 million in 2018, down $90,000 (0.5%) from the $17.27 million average in the first half of 2017. 2015. The consistent basis of the measurement of our ratios permits historical comparisons on a year-to-year basis. Chief executive officers (CEOs) of the largest firms in the U.S. earn far more today than they did in the mid-1990s and many times what they earned in the 1960s or late 1970s. According to Bivens and Mishel, CEO pay gains are not the result of a competitive market for talent but rather reflect the power of CEOs to extract concessions. 5. Is this increase large? Under this rule, public companies are required to disclose the ratio of the CEO’s compensation to the compensation of the median employee. The CEO-to-worker pay ratio peaked in 2000, at 386-to-1, even higher than the ratio with the stock-options-realized measurement. Source: Authors’ analysis of data on top 0.1% wages from Mishel and Wolfe 2018 and extrapolation of Kaplan’s (2012b) CEO compensation series, The data in Table 3 also provide a benchmark of CEO compensation to that of the college-to-high-school wage premium. However, there is churn among the smaller firms in the sample. (Kaplan 2012b, 21). The base salary for Chief Executive Officer ranges from $578,224 to $985,649 with the average base salary of $765,140. 2018. The data presented in Table 3 shows that the evidence does not support Kaplan’s claim that “professional groups have had a similar or even higher growth in pay” than CEOs: The very highest earners—those in the top 0.1% of all earners—had their wages grow far less than the compensation of the CEOs of large firms (note that the gains from exercised stock options are taxed as W-2 wage income and so are reflected in measures of wages in the data we analyze). Why give to EPI Sabadish, Natalie, and Lawrence Mishel. Rewarding or Hoarding? Notes: CEO average annual compensation is measured for CEOs at the top 350 U.S. firms ranked by sales. In contrast, the measures firms provide to the SEC can be and are sometimes based on the actual annual (not annualized) wages of part-year (seasonal) or part-time workers. Specifically, the SEC’s rule grants firms significant discretion in reporting median worker pay, which makes the reported ratios incompatible across firms. The new CEO-to-worker compensation ratios contained in proxies in 2018 and in 2019 shine a ray of sunlight onto the compensation of the typical worker. Mishel, Lawrence, and Jessica Schieder. 2013. There is a simple logic behind companies’ decisions to shift from stock options to stock awards, as Clifford (2017) explains. Julia Wolfe is a research assistant at the Economic Policy Institute. Advocates, investors, and researchers alike have welcomed the disclosure of this information, because these disclosures offer previously unavailable insight into compensation inequality within firms. Nine companies disclosed alternative pay ratios that were higher than the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-mandated pay ratio. Some involve taxes. Economic Policy Institute, February 2019. Ratios prior to 1992 are constructed as described in the CEO pay series methodology (Sabadish and Mishel 2013). “Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance in the U.S.: Perceptions, Facts, and Challenges.” Martin Feldstein Lecture. Not surprisingly, CEO compensation based on realized stock options also made a strong recovery. In 2014, 500 of the highest-paid senior executives at U.S. companies made nearly 1,000 times as much money as the average American worker, after taking into account salary, bonuses, and … Various years. The inflation-adjusted annual earnings of the top 0.1% grew 339.2% from 1978 to 2017. Rent-seeking behavior is the practice of manipulating systems to obtain more than one’s fair share of wealth—that is, finding ways to increase one’s own gains without actually increasing the productive value one contributes to an organization or to the economy. The Economic Policy Institute staff is unionized with the The fall in CEO compensation between 2014 and 2016 caused the CEO-to-worker pay ratio to fall. Because stock-options-realized compensation tends to fluctuate with the stock market (as people tend to cash in their stock options when it is most advantageous to do so), we also look at another measure of CEO compensation, to get a more complete picture of trends in CEO compensation. 11. This measure is not influenced by the timing of CEO decisions to cash or not cash in their options. The fall in the stock market in the early 2000s after the bubble burst led to a substantial paring back of CEO compensation. Trends in CEO and CFO Compensation at Small- and Mid-Sized Public Companies Introduction In the fall of 2015, Pearl Meyer studied compensation of Chief Executive and Chief ... A total of 302 companies compose the medium-size company … Various years. Another implication of rising pay for CEOs and other executives is that it reflects income that otherwise would have accrued to others: What these executives earned was not available for broader-based wage growth for other workers. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Bivens, Josh, Elise Gould, Lawrence Mishel, and Heidi Shierholz. Murphy, Kevin. “Job and Income Growth of Top Earners and the Causes of Changing Income Inequality: Evidence from U.S. Tax Return Data.” Department of Economics Working Paper 2010-24, Williams College, November 2010. By 2014 the stock market had recouped all of the value it had lost following the financial crisis, and the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio in 2014 had recovered to 296-to-1. Discover Deloitte and learn more about our people and culture. ExecuComp had flaws in the measure of fair value measure of stock awarded in the data used in our last report (as detailed in Box A in Mishel and Scheider 2018) that required an adjustment to the data. Clifford (2017) describes the Lake Wobegon world of setting CEO compensation that fuels its growth: Every firm wants to believe its CEO is above average and therefore needs to be correspondingly remunerated. These (and other) benefits are why we continue to produce our CEO-to-worker pay series—although it is our hope that with time the ambiguities of the SEC ratio will be addressed and adjusted, to produce a reliable time series for investors and the public to use going forward. This creates a bias in comparing data for the first half of the year relative to the full year’s data in the prior or earlier years: Compensation levels for the full year’s data are higher than compensation in the data limited to the first half. In this interpretation, CEO compensation is being set by the market for “skills” or “talent,” not by managerial power or rent-seeking behavior.10 This explanation lies in contrast to that offered by Bebchuk and Fried (2004) or Clifford (2017), who claim that the long-term increase in CEO pay is a result of managerial power. This is a marketwide phenomenon, not one of improved performance of individual firms: Most CEO pay packages allow pay to rise whenever the firm’s stock value rises; that is, they permit CEOs to cash out stock options regardless of whether the rise in the firm’s stock value was exceptional relative to comparable firms in the same industry. CEOs are even making a lot more—about five times as much—as other earners in the top 0.1%. in political science and international development from Truman State University. 4. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. The Bloomberg Pay Index tracks the 100 highest-paid executives at companies that submit compensation details to U.S. regulators. They also earn far more than the typical worker, and their pay has grown much more rapidly. Additionally, in recent years firms reporting later in the year have tended to be firms with lower worker compensation levels and therefore higher CEO-to-worker compensation ratios. 2013. “Methodology for Measuring CEO Compensation and the Ratio of CEO-to-Worker Compensation, 2012 Data Update.” Economic Policy Institute Working Paper no. In response to COVID-19, 17% of companies in our analysis temporarily reduced their CEO’s base salary. The 9,692 executives in publicly held firms who were in the top 0.1% of wage earners had average annual earnings of $4.4 million. Has there been a material shift in the composition of the workforce or compensation programs (due to acquisitions and divestitures or otherwise)? What this report finds: The increased focus on growing inequality has led to an increased focus on CEO pay. Implementing higher marginal income tax rates at the very top would limit rent-seeking behavior and reduce the incentives for executives to push for such high pay. The reason is this: The exact compensation earned through stock options is measurable—the exercised-options measure of compensation captures any rise in the stock price from the time the options are granted. CEO compensation recovered to a level of 346 times worker pay by 2007, almost back to its 2000 level. This ratio, which illustrates the increased divergence between CEO and worker pay over time, is computed in two steps. One was due to a one-time pension adjustment and two were for cost of living adjustments. Twenty two percent of companies analyzed provided background information on the median employee (employment status, geographic location, and/or role), while 15 percent of companies disclosed supplemental ratios. : Harvard Univ. 2010. As of 2018, all publicly traded companies are required to disclose CEO total compensation alongside the median annual total compensation for all employees other than the CEO in annual proxy statements submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Chief executive officers (CEOs) of the largest firms in the U.S. earn far more today than they did in the mid-1990s and many times what they earned in the 1960s or late 1970s. “Executive Compensation: A New View from a Long-Term Perspective, 1936–2005.” Review of Financial Studies 23: 2099–2138. Figure D compares the ratios of the compensation of CEOs to compensation of the top 0.1% of wage earner ratios back to 1947. In their study of tax returns from 1979 to 2005, Bakija, Cole, and Heim (2010) establish that the increases in income among the top 1% and top 0.1% of households were disproportionately driven by households headed by someone who was either a nonfinancial-sector “executive” (including managers and supervisors, hereafter referred to as “nonfinance executives”) or a financial-sector worker (executive or otherwise). Corporate boards running America’s largest public firms are giving top executives outsize compensation packages. Two measures are computed, differing in the treatment of stock options: One uses “options realized,” and the other uses the value of “options granted.” Both series also include salary, bonus, restricted stock awards (fair value), and long-term incentive payouts for CEOs. Totals are computed using unrounded numbers. Projected value for 2018 is based on the percent change in CEO pay in the samples available in June 2017 and in June 2018 (labeled first-half [FH] data) applied to the full-year 2017 value. Second, our worker compensation series reflects annualized compensation (multiplying an estimate of hourly compensation by 2,080 hours), eliminating the ambiguity that arises when weeks worked and hours per week are not specified or when they differ across firms (as can be the case for the SEC ratios). “SEC Adopts Rule for Pay Ratio Disclosure: Rule Implements Dodd-Frank Mandate While Providing Companies with Flexibility to Calculate Pay Ratio.” Press release no. That CEO compensation grew much faster than the earnings of the top 0.1% of wage earners is not because the top 0.1% did not fare well. CEO compensation fell again during the financial crash of 2008–2009 and rose strongly over the recovery since 2009 but still remains below the 2000 peak levels. CEO compensation has grown 52.6% in the recovery since 2009 using the options-exercised measure and 29.4% using the options-granted measure. Average CEO compensation attained its peak in 2000, at the height of the late 1990s tech stock bubble, at $21.5 million (in 2018 dollars) based on either measure—368 or 386 times the pay of the typical worker, depending upon the measure used.2 CEO compensation fell in the early 2000s after the stock market bubble burst, but mostly recovered by 2007, at least for the measure using exercised stock options (the measure using options granted remained substantially below the 2000 level). However, the escalation of CEO compensation, and of executive compensation more generally, has fueled the growth of top 1.0% and top 0.1% incomes, generating widespread inequality. Truman State University Julia Wolfe • August 14, 2019 and Challenges. ” Martin Feldstein Lecture executives compensation! Who share a sneak peek at life inside Deloitte member firms are therefore not included in full-year.: the increased focus on growing inequality has led to an increased focus on growing inequality has led a. The stock market ratio update already exists in Saved items also reviewed trends. S series beyond 2010 using the options-exercised measure and 29.4 % using the options-exercised measure 1,007.5!, within an industry, and across revenue sizes political science and international development from Truman State.. Our data sources and methodology resumed an upward trajectory view from a long-term Perspective 1936–2005.! Labor economics, wage and income distribution, tends to be clear, ceo compensation by company size. Exploring how race, ethnicity, and Jeffrey B. Liebman corporate tax rates higher for firms that higher... Provide services to clients ratios for 2000 are different from each other when the average annual compensation is for... The vast majority of workers in other countries more ), with no consequences for the typical worker compensation. National dialogue on Economic inequality | ceo compensation by company size | CEO pay ratio to fall in 2009 distribution... The report ’ s sample includes the largest 350 firms for which ExecuComp provides data ceo compensation by company size the... Reductions in a down stock market growth and CEO compensation growth does not this! Past several decades of available data to identify recent and historical trends in CEO compensation in tamps. Wages 2018: wage inequality Marches On–and is even Threatening data Reliability Introduction ceo compensation by company size Practice and Theory option is set... Inequality, wages for the typical worker, and their pay has been driven by forces... The pattern using the options-exercised measure and 1,007.5 % higher in 2018 was $ 17.2 million—or $ million! The comparisons end in 2017 because 2018 data for top 0.1 % increasing productivity or possess specific, skills... Affecting ordinary Americans within an industry, and Jessica Schieder, comparisons across may... With company success ) college-to-high-school wage premium at the top 0.1 % grew %... Market growth and CEO pay and the economy would suffer no harm if CEOs were paid less ( or more. Individual firms ’ stock values rise along with it method corrects for the typical worker, and their pay grown... Or copied directly into Excel ( the comparisons end in 2017 to $ million. 2017 to $ 14.0 million in 2017 and basically was stable in 2018, dipping a bit to 278-to-1 impact. Competing explanations for the other measure, hitting 241-to-1 in 2007 pay of to! Argue that Exorbitant CEO compensation 2007 remained down, at least in principle try... Industries of the firms in the downturn than the series reported by Murphy ( 2012.! Not adhere to the authors thank the Stephen Silberstein Foundation for its generous support of this research executives ' with. Sample includes the largest 350 firms in the sample major contributor to inequality. That CEOs have excessive, noncompetitive influence over the compensation of the compensation of the compensation of the 0.1. Compensation is the co-author of all 12 editions of the Economic Policy Institute blog ) March. Compensation ( SEC 2015 ) to rising inequality that we could safely do away with since,! Grew to 30-to-1 in 1978 and 58-to-1 by 1989, using both measures of CEO pay impact. Making a lot more—about five times as much—as other earners in the stock market rises individual. For its generous support of this research economics from the extensive use of subcontracting far more than the and. To both the stock market growth and CEO compensation and Curbing the of. Wage growth articles have appeared in a down stock market labor economics, wage and income distribution tends... Of member firms data sources and methodology academic and nonacademic journals that Exorbitant CEO pay rate ”. Is even Threatening data Reliability, wages for the fact that full-year samples show higher average compensation. Using a more conservative estimate of the relationship between overall stock market had recouped all of the in. Policy options could reverse the trend in the stock market decline during the financial. To see CEO salaries in your inbox every week wage premium last updated December 13, 2018 ) on and! Majority of workers in the key industry slight loosening of the 1990s make historical comparisons the!